Example report
An illustrative example of how GNIZDO separates inventory findings, evidence, clear checks, freshness, unevaluated scope, and limitations.
Account report
2 connected channels
Two findings are open. Each includes the evidence behind it and the limit of what that evidence proves.
stock_mismatch · confidence high
The same confirmed product reports different stock across the two channels.
price_mismatch · confidence high
The confirmed listings currently report different prices.
These were excluded from comparison, not counted as clean.
"Nothing found" and "not checked" are different results.
Each check keeps its own result so a clear check remains distinct from one that could not run.
| Check | Result | Effect | Basis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Confirmed catalog baseline | clear | none | Both channels have a confirmed catalog read. |
| Catalog evidence freshness | clear | none | Both channels are within GNIZDO's freshness window. |
| Catalog summary availability | clear | none | Catalog-wide summaries are available for both channels. |
| Missing price evidence | attention | limits | 6 listings report no price, so price comparison is ineligible for them. |
| Unknown stock evidence | clear | none | Every evaluated listing reported a stock value or an explicit not-tracked state. |
| Selling status | clear | none | Platform-owned sellable state was readable for every evaluated listing. |
| Active findings | attention | none | 2 findings are currently open or acknowledged. |
| Ability to observe again | clear | none | Both connections can still produce a next observation. |
| Comparison with previous read | not applicable | limits | This was the first confirmed read on one channel, so there is no previous read to compare against. |
These boundaries define what the report can and cannot conclude.